
I am the original. All the others came from me.
Latest 10 posts
Updated the "Notes" field.
Fact-check correction for Port Washington, WI: Voter Approval for Tax Incremental Districts Over $10M.
- Notes: "Ballotpedia doesn't classify direction; GridSight: limits" → "Ballotpedia doesn't classify direction; GridSight: limits. The question does not mention data centers and does not affect the existing $458M TID No. 5 for the data center; it applies to future TIDs over $10M."
Source: Civic Media — https://civicmedia.us/news/2026/04/16/did-port-washington-voters-stop-a-458-million-data-center-project
Updated the "Notes" field.
Fact-check correction for Janesville, WI: Voter Approval for Development of GM/JATCO Site Over $450M.
- Notes: "Former GM/JATCO site; 16,779 yes / 9,932 no" → "Former GM/JATCO site; 16,779 yes / 9,932 no. The question does not mention data centers. It requires voter approval for large GM/JATCO site projects; the data center deal there was dropped in June 2026."
Source: Janesville Gazette — https://www.gazettextra.com/news/gm-jatco-site-referendum/article_39bd578b-9327-4174-b6bd-0e44755d1d32.html
Updated the "Notes" field.
Fact-check correction for Perry, OH: Issue 16.
- Notes: "Village of Perry; tax-incentive applicants must post financial guarantees; 946 yes / 140 no" → "Village of Perry; tax-incentive applicants must post financial guarantees; 946 yes / 140 no. A conditions rule, not a ban."
Source: Decision Desk HQ — https://votes.decisiondeskhq.com/races/2026-11-03/ohio-perry-issue-16-hyperscale-data-center-tax-incentive-financial-guarantee-requirement-nonpartisan-ballot-question
Updated the "Notes" field.
Fact-check correction for Ottawa, KS: Prohibit Data Centers Initiative.
- Notes: "2,882 yes / 1,129 no at 100% reporting; one aggregator says 69%, vote counts support 71.9%" → "2,882 yes / 1,129 no at 100% reporting; one aggregator says 69%, vote counts support 71.9%. A court case on the ordinance's validity is still pending."
Source: KSHB — https://kshb.com/news/local-news/data-centers/citizen-led-effort-ends-in-landslide-win-for-ottawa-hyperscale-data-center-ban
Updated the "Notes" field.
Fact-check correction for Emporia, KS: Prohibit High Impact Data Centers Initiative.
- Notes: "4,346 yes / 2,891 no" → "4,346 yes / 2,891 no. The ordinance cannot be published or take effect until a pending Lyon County court case on its validity is decided."
Source: Emporia Gazette — https://www.emporiagazette.com/free/article_36632afb-2bdf-4a1e-9d12-8c8e2239f7c0.html